
Electronically submit applications and all supporting documents to the Chairperson of the Mercy College IRB at:
Faculty members sponsoring student research may electronically sign off the application if stated in the email text and sent by the faculty member.
Mercy College is committed to the ethical principles for the protection of human participants in research set forth in the Belmont Report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The College recognizes and accepts responsibility, which it shares with its investigators and other researchers, for determining that research involving human participants fulfills these ethical principles. The basic ethical principles as outlined in the Belmont Report guide the Institutional Review Board's deliberations and decision-making, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.
The IRB typically meets on the 3rd Thursday of the month. All Category III proposals to be reviewed at each monthly meeting must be submitted by the dates below to be eligible for review during the next scheduled meeting. Category I and II proposals may be submitted at any time.
Submission Dates |
Meeting Dates |
September 2, 2019 |
September 19, 2019 |
October 1, 2019 |
October 17, 2019 |
November 4, 2019 |
November 21, 2019 |
December 2, 2019 |
December 19, 2019 |
January 2, 2020 |
January 16, 2020 |
February 3, 2020 |
February 20, 2020 |
March 2, 2020 |
March 19, 2020 |
April 1, 2020 |
April 16, 2020 |
May 4, 2020 |
May 14, 2020 |
Members of the Mercy College Institutional Review Board for Research (2019-2020)
IRB Members |
Program or Department Represented |
David Kilpatrick |
English (School of Liberal Arts) |
Li Yong | Finance (School of Business) |
Jane Hogan |
Social Work (School of Social and Behavioral Sciences) |
Rebecca Trenz |
Psychology (School of Social and Behavioral Sciences) |
Jeong Kim |
Criminal Justice (School of Social and Behavioral Sciences) |
Kathleen Golisz (Chair) |
Associate Dean, School of Health and Natural Sciences/ Occupational Therapy |
James Gurley |
Physical Therapy (School of Health and Natural Sciences) |
Kathleen Kenney-Riley |
Nursing (School of Health and Natural Sciences) |
Francine M Seruya |
Occupational Therapy (School of Health and Natural Sciences) |
Mónica Stanton-Koko |
Health Science (School of Health and Natural Sciences) |
Wendy Mages |
Childhood Education (School of Education) |
Matthijs Koopmans |
Educational Leadership (School of Education) |
Helge Wasmuth |
Childhood Education (School of Education) |
Christine Riley |
Community Member |
Saul Fisher |
Office of the Provost – Liaison |
The Mercy College IRB will provide the Principal Investigator with documentation of the anonymous reviewers' decisions. Reviewers will grant the proposal one of the following decisions:
The Mercy College IRB will conduct continuing review of research at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk to human participants, but not less than once per year.
The IRB also has authority to observe or have a third party observe the consent process and the research.
Follow-up reports will be sent to the principal investigator or faculty mentor approximately 1 month prior to the follow-up review date. They should be completed promptly and returned to the Chairperson of the Mercy College IRB before the date required.
The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative is the online training program used at Mercy College for training all personnel conducting research involving human or animal subjects. All Mercy College research personnel, including principal investigators, co-investigators, faculty sponsors, student investigators, and any researcher who is directly involved in research including research with human or animal subjects, must complete CITI training. In addition, the CITI training program must be completed prior to receipt of IRB approval of a new or existing application.
The Mercy College IRB has authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects.